Unusual Volkswagen No Start

Autosphere » Mechanical » Unusual Volkswagen No Start
Mark Lemay is President of Auto Aide Technical Services. You can reach him at: [email protected] Photo Mark Lemay

Delving deeper revealed problems beyond the usual fuel and spark issues.

Volkswagen Beetle Photo Volkswagen of America

This time around, our subject vehicle was a 2016 Volkswagen Beetle with a no start issue. Powered by a 1.8-litre Turbo engine with Direct Injection, the customer stated that the car was running normally, until one morning when they went to start the car and it turned over but would not fire up.

Once we had the vehicle in our custody, we started off with a code scan of the PCM and retrieved an Oxygen sensor code, a fuel pressure regulator code, and a communication bus code. There were no immobilizer codes, so the communication code was ignored. Since we had the scan tool hooked up, we decided to look at some cranking data. The only unusual thing we noticed was that the Actual High Fuel Pressure was about 200 psi higher than the Desired Fuel Pressure. Odd, but it should not have kept the car from starting.

Relative compression and no faults

The usual checks were performed, and the engine was tested for spark and injector pulse. It had both, and a relative compression check revealed no faults.

Since the engine appeared to have spark, fuel, and compression we decided to dig a little deeper. An in-cylinder pressure transducer was added to cylinder #1 and the engine was cranked over again to see where the actual injector and ignition timing were in relation to Top Dead Centre (TDC).

Figure 1 shows the results of the test. At first glance the injector and ignition timing seem to be normal but on closer inspection we noticed that the coil and injector were firing on every other compression stroke.

Firing the coil and injector every other compression stroke is an unusual failure, it can only happen if the PCM s receiving bad information or the PCM is defective. The PCM power and ground circuits were checked, no faults found. We decided to scope the CMP and CKP and compare it to the known “good” operation. We noticed that the CMP timing was off about 8 degrees from known well. It was enough to indicate there was a timing problem, possibly a stretched chain but still, not enough to cause the odd firing and no start condition.

Not possible

At this point I knew we were overlooking something, but it wasn’t obvious. After studying the pattern for a bit longer, we finally discovered what the problem was. We went back and measured the time from compression peak to compression peak. Peak to peak time was 180 milliseconds. Simple math would indicate that the engine was spinning at 600 RPM. This is clearly not possible, and the explanation was that it should have been obvious from the first time we looked at the scope pattern. The ignition wasn’t firing on every other compression stroke, it was firing on every compression stroke. It just so happened that there an extra compression stroke occurred in place of the exhaust stroke. The exhaust cam timing had jumped far enough that the exhaust valve was closed on the exhaust stroke. This caused the second compression stroke as the intake valve was also closed on the exhaust stroke. This also accounts for the high fuel pressure as the High-Pressure Fuel Pump is driven off the exhaust cam. An unusual failure, but once we understood the in-cylinder waveform, the rest was easy to remedy.

Testing initially seemed to indicate that coil and injector were firing on every other stroke. Photo Mark Lemay
AAPEX 2022 Button

SEMA 2021 Button

GTE 2022

Popular Posts



05jan(jan 5)7:00 am08(jan 8)11:59 pm2023 CES