J.D. Power Releases 2018 Canadian Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study

Autosphere » Dealerships » J.D. Power Releases 2018 Canadian Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study

J.D. Power has released the results of its 2018 Canadian Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study.

According to the study, for the second consecutive year, auto dealers in Canada continue to stress the importance of the dealer-lender relationship and are more satisfied with lenders that not only understand their needs, but also consistently exceed their expectations

As the auto retail financing industry becomes more commoditized, dealers cite “people relationships” and “ease of doing business” as the top two reasons for their selection of a financing provider. The importance of these two reasons are echoed both by captive and non-captive lenders. Factors such as dealer compensation and competitive rates are also relevant in the provider selection decision, but are of secondary importance to customer service-related reasons.

“The marketplace in Canada continues to be strong, yet highly competitive, so relationships are what make the difference,” said Jim Houston, Senior Director of Automotive Finance at J.D. Power. “Lenders can adjust their credit policy, interest rate or dealer compensation plans, but it’s how they interact with dealers and resolve issues when they arise that have the greatest effect on satisfaction. When overall satisfaction increases, dealers are more willing and able to deepen the business relationship with lenders.”

The study, now in its 20th year, finds that problem resolution and the speed with which an issue is rectified significantly affect dealer satisfaction levels. Moreover, it’s the credit department that bears the load and acts as the first port of call when things go sour. Six in 10 (60 percent) auto dealers indicate that credit desk personnel are the first point of contact for any problems or concerns. Additionally, 76 percent of dealers say they were able to engage with credit staff when needed.

“While both captive and non-captive lenders’ credit departments perform well in making themselves available, lenders should not rest on their laurels,” Houston said. “Instead, they should maintain a sense of urgency when responding to dealers, as satisfaction levels plummet when the credit department is not readily available. Leveraging various communication channels and technology coupled with adequate credit department staffing are some measures in which lenders can demonstrate their commitment and differentiate themselves to increase satisfaction.”

Additional findings of the 2018 study show:

Lender selection is influenced by more than just relationships: Beyond the relationship influence, dealers have different views of satisfaction depending on the type of lender with which they are doing business. Dealers who work with captive lenders place higher importance on the lender’s customer loyalty rebates (27 percent) than those who work with non-captive lenders (4 percent). In contrast, dealers that choose to do business with non-captive lenders place a greater importance on dealer compensation (13 percent), compared with those that choose to work with captive lenders (4 percent).

Sales performance requires improvement: In a highly competitive and fragmented market, exceeding expectations becomes a paramount differentiator. The study finds that dealers hold their lender sales representatives to a higher set of standards, yet sales representatives exceed expectations less than half of the time.

Lender Rankings

Overall dealer satisfaction in the captive segment is 875 (on a 1,000-point scale), a 7-point increase from 2017. Overall satisfaction in the non-captive segment is 862, a 4-point decrease from 2017.

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services ranked highest in the captive lender segment with a score of 948. Ford Credit (903) ranked second; Honda Financial Services (883) ranks third; and Toyota Financial Services (878) ranked fourth.

Among non-captive lenders, TD Auto Finance ranked highest with a score of 884. Bank of Montreal (881) ranked second and RBC Royal Bank (868) ranked third.

The 2018 Canadian Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study captures 4,861 finance provider evaluations across the two segments from new-vehicle dealerships in Canada. The study was fielded in February-March 2018.

Categories : Dealerships

Popular Posts